Write 500-700 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. For this Discussion Board, please complete the following: The key difference between previous university degrees you received and obtaining a doctorate is the requirement to produce a dissertation grounded in your own original research. Research is the foundation of this program and a key element of the roles and responsibilities of a scholar-practitioner. Discuss the following: Elaborate your own position on what it means to conduct original research.Formulate an argument on why the research process is important.Compose a definition of critical thinking, and cite a source.Propose how critical thinking might change your doctoral writing from your previous writing style . Share on Facebook Tweet Follow us Sample Answer The Significance of Original Research and Critical Thinking in Doctoral Studies Entering a doctoral program marks a pivotal moment in an academic career, distinguished primarily by the requirement to produce original research that culminates in a dissertation. This process sets the stage for a deeper exploration of knowledge and a greater level of responsibility as a scholar-practitioner. In this discussion, I will elaborate on my understanding of conducting original research, articulate the importance of the research process, define critical thinking, and discuss how critical thinking will transform my writing style as I pursue my doctorate. Understanding Original Research Conducting original research involves the pursuit of knowledge that goes beyond existing literature. It requires identifying gaps in current understanding, formulating unique questions, and deploying rigorous methodologies to explore these questions. My position is that original research is not merely about collecting data; it is about generating new insights that contribute to the academic community and society at large. For instance, if I were to investigate educational disparities within urban settings, my original research might involve creating a new framework for understanding the impact of socio-economic factors on student achievement. This would involve not just reviewing existing studies but also collecting qualitative data through interviews or focus groups to capture the lived experiences of students and educators. By synthesizing these perspectives with theoretical frameworks, I can offer a fresh viewpoint that may lead to new solutions or policy recommendations. Moreover, the responsibility inherent in conducting original research cannot be overstated. It necessitates an ethical approach to engaging with subjects, ensuring that their voices are represented authentically. This sense of accountability drives me to approach my research with integrity and sensitivity, particularly when dealing with vulnerable populations. The Importance of the Research Process The research process is crucial for several reasons. First and foremost, it fosters rigor and credibility in academic work. A systematic approach allows researchers to collect, analyze, and interpret data in a way that minimizes bias and enhances validity. For example, by employing established research methodologies such as randomized controlled trials or qualitative case studies, I can ensure that my findings are grounded in reliable evidence. Additionally, the research process cultivates critical thinking skills. It compels scholars to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and consider alternative explanations. This iterative process encourages a mindset of inquiry where conclusions are drawn based on careful analysis rather than preconceived notions. As I navigate through my research journey, this critical engagement will enhance not only my understanding but also the quality of my work. Furthermore, engaging in research promotes dialogue within the academic community. Sharing findings allows for collaboration and constructive criticism, which are essential for advancing knowledge. By contributing original research to this collective conversation, I can help shape discussions within my field and potentially influence policy or practice. Defining Critical Thinking Critical thinking can be defined as the ability to think clearly and rationally about what to believe or do. It entails analyzing information, evaluating evidence, and synthesizing diverse viewpoints to arrive at well-supported conclusions (Facione, 2011). This definition underscores the importance of being deliberate in thought processes and encourages a commitment to rigorous evaluation. In the context of doctoral studies, critical thinking is vital for examining not just the findings of my research but also the methodologies employed and the implications of these findings within a broader context. It challenges me to be reflective and self-aware in my approach to scholarship. Transforming Doctoral Writing Through Critical Thinking The integration of critical thinking into my doctoral writing will significantly alter my previous academic style. In prior coursework, I often focused on summarizing existing literature and presenting well-established arguments without thoroughly interrogating their foundations. However, with an emphasis on original research, I recognize that my writing must reflect deeper analytical engagement. For example, rather than simply citing existing studies that support my hypothesis, I will critically evaluate those studies—examining their methodologies, discussing potential biases, and considering counterarguments. This approach will enrich my dissertation by presenting a nuanced discussion that acknowledges complexity rather than offering simplistic conclusions. Additionally, critical thinking encourages reflexivity in writing. I will need to remain aware of my biases and assumptions as a researcher. By questioning my perspectives and being open to feedback from peers and mentors, I can produce work that is not only academically sound but also socially responsible. Conclusion In summary, conducting original research in a doctoral program represents a profound commitment to advancing knowledge through rigorous inquiry. The research process is vital for fostering credibility and promoting critical engagement with complex issues. By adopting a definition of critical thinking that emphasizes clarity and rationality (Facione, 2011), I can enhance my scholarship significantly. As I embark on this journey, I look forward to transforming my writing style through critical thinking—moving from mere summarization to an engaged analysis that contributes meaningfully to the academic discourse. References Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings Paper No. 1. Insight Assessment. This question has been answered. Get Answer
